Dealing with troublesome package upgrades or removals.
Posted by Steve on Fri 23 Sep 2005 at 16:04
There are times when you have a package which you cannot upgrade, remove, or install due to scripting errors. 99% of the time these will be bugs which will be fixed after you've reported them. But if you cannot wait you'll need to fix them yourself.
In addition to the actual files in the package a binary .deb file contains other things:
- Information on its dependancies.
- Scripts to run at various times.
- Pre-installation scripts
- Post-installation scripts.
- Pre-removal scripts.
- Post-removal scripts.
These scripts are often overlooked when examining packages and many users never need to touch them.
To pick a package at random, the gnump3d package contains two scripts. One "postinst" which runs just after the package has been installed, and another "postrm" which runs just after the package has been removed.
In this case the scripts are very simple and serve only to:
- Add a new user to the system so that the server can run as its own dedicated user. (postinst)
- Setup a logfile directory, and optionally upgrade an obsolete configuration file. (postinst)
- Remove the logfiles, and configuration files when the package is purged. (postrm).
(Note: The new user that is added is never removed. This is common practise in Debian packages).
So what does this mean? Well in normal cases you'd not notice these being executed and the scripts will be bug free.
Sometimes you will see errors, such as this one:
root@mystery:~# dpkg --purge gforge-ldap-openldap dpkg: error processing gforge-ldap-openldap (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 5 Errors were encountered while processing: gforge-ldap-openldap
What do we see here? Well the command should have purged the package gforge-ldap-openldap. Instead it gave an error, and failed.
In this case we can see the source of the error:
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 5
The next step is to find the script, and see why it fails.
All the scripts are stored in a single location, named after the package that they belong to. The directory to examine is /var/lib/dpkg/info, and to return to our GNUMP3d package we can see its files with:
skx@mystery:~$ ls -1 /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.* /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.conffiles /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.config /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.md5sums /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.postinst /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.postrm /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.prerm /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnump3d.templates skx@mystery:~$
Here there are some files that you can ignore:
- .conffiles
- This contains a list of all the configuration files associated with this package.
- .config
- This file contains the results of any debconf based configuration questions.
- .list
- This file contains all the files included in the package.
- .md5sums
- Predictably this file contains the MD5 checksum of all files installed by the package. This can be useful if you wish to check your systems integrity; although using tripwire or aide would be preferable.
The other files we see are the scripts associated with the package:
- gnump3d.postinst
- gnump3d.prerm
- gnump3d.postrm
These scripts will run at the appropriate time (post-install, or pre-removal and post-removal respectively).
The gforge-ldap-openldap error message we saw was because the script file failed:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gforge-ldap-openldap.prerm
To fix this you have two choices:
- Edit the script to make the failure non-terminal.
- Examine the script and determine why it fails.
In general most of the scripts associated with Debian packages will begin with:
#!/bin/sh -e
Or:
#!/bin/sh set -e
Either of these two scripts will abort with an error if something fails. A simple fix is to remove the "-e", or the "set -e" line from the script before repeating your upgrade/install/removal attempt.
A more thorough fix is beyond the scope of this introduction, but if you can follow the script you may be able to work out what is failing and correct the problem.
Don't forget to report a bug!
[ Send Message | View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]
In general bugs such as these will not be fixed in Stable, unless the package maintainer can convince the release manager(s) that they justify an upgrade in a point release.
Steve
--
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
I am new to this.
I just want to know detail steps of how to add postinst file in debian package, and how it will be invoked after installing. That is where to call postinst script (in rules file or somewhere else).
Please give detail steps.
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
dpkg had a useful debug option, from the man page:
"-Doctal | --debug=octal
Set debugging on. octal is formed by bitwise-orring
desired values together from the list below (note that
these values may change in future
releases). -Dh or --debug=help display these debugging
values.
number description
1 Generally helpful progress information
2 Invocation and status of maintainer scripts
10 Output for each file processed
100 Lots of output for each file processed
20 Output for each configuration file
200 Lots of output for each configuration file
40 Dependencies and conflicts
400 Lots of dependencies/conflicts output
1000 Lots of drivel about e.g. the dpkg/info dir
2000 Insane amounts of drivel"
In trouble with scripts, I run "dpkg -D2 foo-bar.deb" and
then I run manually each script that show warnings or
errors.
PS: Ops, in this week I too had trouble with gforge
packages... But this dont may means that we had a bug!
PPS: Sorry for english mistakes, I am still learning it.
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
I'm using SimpleMepis 6.5
I could not install/uninstall anything for over three weeks
now. I don't have much hair left had this gone on any longer.
Tried to uninstall taskjuggler and got this:
Preparing to replace taskjuggler 2.2.0-1ubuntu1 (using .../taskjuggler_2.2.0-1ubuntu1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement taskjuggler ...
touch: missing file operand
Try `touch --help' for more information.
dpkg: warning - old post-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
touch: missing file operand
Try `touch --help' for more information.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/taskjuggler_2.2.0-1ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack):
subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1
touch: missing file operand
Try `touch --help' for more information.
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
I found a link thru goggle to your article here.
I removed the "set e" and now life is good again.
Thanks again
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
Letting packages run their own scripts to clean themselves up for removal is fraught, but no different than the headaches with uninstallers on Windows.
Unfortunately Linux packaging systems like to let packages leave doo-doo all over the filesystem rather than enforcing a convenient hierarchy that would allow purging and at worst leave some symlinks lying around. (No system is very good about this - even OS X, with its relatively sane .app objects, lets programs leave all sort of garbage in "Library" or other directories. IIRC PC-BSD seemed to be trying to enforce installation of a complete purgable dependency hierarchy per package; obviously a bit space-inefficient but I'm not sure how that's otherwise working out for them.)
Just being a little tidier (and shifting away from packages-can-run-whatever-script-they-want to packages-tell-one-standard-piece-of-code-where-they-might-put-thi ngs-and-what-to-remove) can go a long way. dpkg *has* this, with its .list files, but obviously some additional flexibility would be needed there to not just call additional arbitrary scripts per-package.
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Send Message ]
Are bugs in these scripts fixed in stable? Or we have to wait for next release?
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]