You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the article Why do media players have such complex interfaces?:

#5 Re: on KDE Posted by ajt (204.193.xx.xx) on Wed 13 Jul 2005 at 12:03 I'd agree that amaroK is different. I've also found it to be mostly stable and the GUI seems to be obvious. I like the fact it minimises to nothing, and the the basic GUI is KDE standard rather than some funky bitmap disaster. I've tried Kaffeine since I posted this rant, and it's not bad, nicer looking that the plain xine-ui. However xine and hence Kaffeine still crashes when playing MP3. I've not tried KPlayer. XMMS is okay, but only with the right skin, the default is pretty horrid. I don't play web streams much so I can't comment, mostly I play my own CDs that have been ripped to Ogg. -- "It's Not Magic, It's Work" Adam

Username:	Anonymous
Title:
Your Comment:
Posting Format:	BBCode HTML Text Plain Text Textile

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account