You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the article Question: DHCP and automatic DNS Updates:

#4 Re: Question: DHCP and automatic DNS Updates Posted by adam (198.133.xx.xx) on Mon 26 Sep 2005 at 15:55 Bump. Running bind is a great exercise, and frankly a lot of us who are doing it are doing it to learn enough to implement it on our corporate networks, which aren't managable without it. I've long wanted to figure this one out -- ie using industry standard products to do dynamic dns in a big and scalable way. Originally my interest was for the FAS undergrad network at Harvard. It's a lot of people, they all get routable addresses, and the network segments aren't so big that we can give everyone an effectively static IP. Any time you have more people who COULD be on a network segment at some time than 253 and want everyone to have a static alias whichever segment they're on at the moment, this need makes a lot of sense. I'd love to see some good answers on the topic.

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account