You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the article Filesystems (ext3, reiser, xfs, jfs) comparison on Debian Etch:

#127 How do your results compare with these Posted by Anonymous (219.88.xx.xx) on Tue 17 Apr 2007 at 07:20 How do your results compare with these from: http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm The first column names the filesystem tested. The second column records the total time (in seconds) it took to run the filesystem benchmarking software bonnie++ (Version 1.93c). The third column records the total number of megabytes needed to store 655 megabytes of raw data. SMALLER is better. FILESYSTEM TIME DISK USAGE REISER4 (lzo) 1,938 278 REISER4 (gzip) 2,295 213 REISER4 3,462 692 EXT2 4,092 816 JFS 4,225 806 EXT4 4,408 816 EXT3 4,421 816 XFS 4,625 799 REISER3 6,178 793 FAT32 12,342 988 NTFS-3g >10,414 772 Each test was preformed 5 times and the average value recorded. SMALLER is better. The Reiser4 filesystem clearly had the best test results. The FAT32 filesystem had the worst test results. The bonnie++ tests were preformed, with the following parameters: bonnie++ -n128:128k:0

Username:	Anonymous
Title:
Your Comment:
Posting Format:	BBCode HTML Text Plain Text Textile

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account