You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the article Filesystems (ext3, reiser, xfs, jfs) comparison on Debian Etch:

#128 Re: Filesystems (ext3, reiser, xfs, jfs) comparison on Debian Etch Posted by Anonymous (200.229.xx.xx) on Tue 8 May 2007 at 13:11 Another things missing: - What did you use to compare the times? What tools? Which commands? - It was not mentioned the fact that Ext3 reserves 5% of the HD to the root user. (see http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=215177) - Some points in the article like the other is better. That to generic to say that other FS took less or spend less. (e.g.: The ReiserFS used 49% of CPU to remove ISO, when other FS used about 10%). What other FS took about 10% of CPU? The rest of the article I found good. My tip is trying to use a better server, like a Core Duo or an AMD X2, or even an Xeon or Opteron, since we`re talking of bussiness servers (but that`s good enough if you don`t have one to test). Maybe, a good thing is to test in SATA drivers or SCSI... Note: I use ext3 mostly because of compatibility. I like new stuff, but I don`t like to play with FS's.

Username:	Anonymous
Title:
Your Comment:
Posting Format:	BBCode HTML Text Plain Text Textile

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account