Add Comment

You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the weblog Obfuscating source IP for SMTP AUTH in Exim4


Re: Obfuscating source IP for SMTP AUTH in Exim4
Posted by lee (193.82.xx.xx) on Wed 28 Feb 2007 at 10:46
Because I'm interpreting "SMTP environment" as traditional message transmission using SMTP over port 25. Whereas message submission over port 587 is a separate, albeit SMTP compatible, protocol. An relevent example of this is section 8.8 of RFC4409 which allows for header rewriting to match local policy.

Yes, I'm deliberately fiting my interpretation to a) what I consider the cleanest solution (i.e. doesn't involve using false information in a trace field) b) what is actually being implemented by many sites in the field.

Username:Anonymous
Title:
Your Comment:

Posting Format:

 

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Some help on entry formatting is available

User Login

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account

Quick Site Search