You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the weblog Postfix to rewrite (or masquerade) Received header

#4 Re: Postfix to rewrite (or masquerade) Received header Posted by simonw (212.24.xx.xx) on Thu 17 May 2007 at 12:44 We are looking at adding some Received header tests, but we'd only reject on it if the address was clearly blacklists as a known source of spam. Which is what I'm getting at -- what is it about these Received headers they don't like. Fiddling with headers like this is RFC infringing, any inconsistent or incomplete Received headers I'd accept as reasonable grounds for a spam rejection. Are you sure it isn't just the clients IP address is on a blacklist somewhere?

Username:	Anonymous
Title:
Your Comment:
Posting Format:	BBCode HTML Text Plain Text Textile

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account