You are not currently logged in. If you do not have a user account then please consider creating one and logging in before you post your comment. This will allow you to track replies to your comment, and take part in the site much more freely.

To add your comment, fill in all the boxes below and then preview it to make sure you're happy with the way that it looks.

This is the comment you were replying to, attached to the weblog Upgrading to a sloppy SpamAssassin

#2 Re: Upgrading to a sloppy SpamAssassin Posted by lee (193.82.xx.xx) on Fri 10 Feb 2006 at 11:23 Yeah, leaving those entries in will install the "volatile" packages over the standard sarge ones, but that should be safe. (If you just include the sloppy line it won't do that.) The same way that the security repositories work. However, these are not newer versions of the code (despite the fact that "volatile" and "unstable" are synonyms) just newer versions of the data files associated with it - which, in the majority of cases, should be desirable. spamassassin differs from this rule, which is why it's in the "sloppy" sub-release.

Username:	Anonymous
Title:
Your Comment:
Posting Format:	BBCode HTML Text Plain Text Textile

Inappropriate comments will be removed.

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account