Do you use IPv6?

Submitted by Federico2 on Sun 23 Sep 2007

Tags: , ,

 

Yes  <-> 10%95 votes
Not now, maybe soon  <-> 23%209 votes
No  <-> 59%527 votes
Huh?  <-> 5%53 votes
Total 884 votes

Posted by kaerast (82.47.xx.xx) on Sun 23 Sep 2007 at 23:40
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
Well I say yes, what I actually mean is my server listens on IPv6 but I don't have a home router which will let me test this and my logs don't list ip addresses so I don't know if it's actually being used.

[ Parent ]

Posted by eric (194.2.xx.xx) on Mon 24 Sep 2007 at 10:59
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
My provider (free.fr) don't handle IPv6. A petition (http://ipv6pourtous.free.fr/) is currently on but only 24k people seems interested...

:eric:
http://blog.sietch-tabr.com

[ Parent ]

Posted by ajt (204.193.xx.xx) on Tue 25 Sep 2007 at 09:56
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
This question was asked a short while ago here:

http://www.debian-administration.org/polls/94

I wonder how the results will turn out this time?

Is IPv6 gaining any real traction in the market?

--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam

[ Parent ]

Posted by daemon (146.231.xx.xx) on Wed 26 Sep 2007 at 15:02
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

Is IPv6 gaining any real traction in the market?

It will have to soon. I've recently returned from a very interesting conference where it was stated by one of the directors of our regional NREN that our IPv4 address space will be depleted within the next 3-4 years -- so the end of IPv4 is closer than alot of people think.

Start planning and implementing now, and there won't be a mad panic rush in a few years as major networks start renumbering things to make everything work again...

Year 2000 all over again, but without the media hype, and more sting in the tail.

Cheers.
:wq

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (198.240.xx.xx) on Thu 27 Sep 2007 at 12:14

our IPv4 address space will be depleted within the next 3-4 years

People have been saying that for at least the last 4 years.

We will eventually need IPv6, but I don't think it helps to speed migration that its advocates have built up a consistent track record of making false alarmist statements like the above.

[ Parent ]

Posted by daemon (146.231.xx.xx) on Thu 27 Sep 2007 at 17:27
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

When I said "our IPv4 address space will be depleted within the next 3-4 years" I meant "our" as in the IP address space that is administered by our LIR, not the global address space. Certainly there are places and RIR's that will have slack address space coming out of their ears for some time to come, but it's not an even distribution. "Our" address space is very likely to be depleted within the next 3-4 years, or at least to the extent that it becomes very difficult to manage the remaining allocatable ranges.

Migrating away from IPv4 is unavoidable. We have IPv6 now, it works now (and has some very nice features regardless of the size of it's address space), and the two can coexist vary happily in the mean time, so why do some folks always take the nay-saying denialist approach?

OK, maybe that last sentence was a bit over-done, but I was retaliating to being called "alarmist" when quoted out of context ;-)

Besides, playing with IPv6 is fun, it just takes a while to train your head to remember bigger addresses...

Cheers.
:wq

[ Parent ]

Posted by rob (72.192.xx.xx) on Fri 28 Sep 2007 at 17:15
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
The last time I looked, about six months or so ago, there weren't that many IPv6 compliant routers on store shelves (US that is, and the UK?). Has that changed?

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (24.10.xx.xx) on Fri 28 Sep 2007 at 20:43
Although the space on IPv4 is limited, and there definitely is need for an upgrade, I see IPv6 as complete overkill. If you do the math, the number of addresses available in IPv6 would enable every atom within the body of every living person on the earth today to be assigned an IP address, and still have leftovers. I don't know about you , but I don't personally need over a trillion IP addresses...

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (24.69.xx.xx) on Sun 30 Sep 2007 at 04:26
And why the hell not? How do you expect your body to do internal communications once the current address space runs out? You _do_ realise the worlds population is growing at a rapid rate and that _will_ force us to go to ipv6 just for internal bodily comms, let alone inter-personal comms.

Seriously, think about the implications of what you have said before making such a ridiculous statement!

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Sun 30 Sep 2007 at 17:21
Check http://www.sixxs.net and 'apt-get install aiccu' to get IPv6 connectivity for free :)

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (76.113.xx.xx) on Mon 1 Oct 2007 at 07:15
No. IPv6 is not a natural extension of IPv4. No serious person is going to abandon their IPv4 presence on the internet in favor of this IPv6 abomination.

Jeff

[ Parent ]

User Login

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account

Quick Site Search

Poll Archive

View Prior Polls