I backup my systems with

Submitted by ajt on Mon 11 Aug 2008

Tags: , ,

 

Nothing  <-> 21%414 votes
tar & gzip/bzip2 by hand or home made script  <-> 45%878 votes
rsnapshot  <-> 7%145 votes
BackupPC  <-> 8%160 votes
Amanda  <-> 2%48 votes
Bacula  <-> 8%156 votes
Some commercial application  <-> 3%67 votes
Some really expensive commercial application...  <-> 3%65 votes
Total 1933 votes

Posted by Anonymous (24.47.xx.xx) on Mon 11 Aug 2008 at 11:57
.........I see rsnapshot, but what about classic RSYNC? That's what I use, plus CRON to run regularly. I don't need incrementals, then I suppose rsnapshot might be helpful. I find that tar+gzip is WAY too laggy when reading the archives.

[ Parent ]

Posted by ajt (204.193.xx.xx) on Mon 11 Aug 2008 at 13:56
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

I Suppose I should have made the "home made script" option more generic and less proscriptive. Feel free to read option two as any home made script using any combination of other tools that are not explicitly listed elsewhere in this poll....

--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (85.127.xx.xx) on Thu 14 Aug 2008 at 11:22
Quite the same here. I used rsync for a long time -- synced my workstation with an external USB HDD. For quite some time now I use Unison. Unison can do the same as with rsync plus a whole lot more.

For example, whereever I am, I sync my local machine (I have a workstation and a subnotebook which I keep in sync (some dirs only)) with some remote server using Unisons SSH option. This way I never have to carry around some device like USB stick/disk and I cannot just sync my machine but also have a "backup" (I know, no real backup but ...).

I can strongly recommend using Unison with some star topology setup e.g. a remote server, worksation at home and some subnotebook for on the go ...

[ Parent ]

Posted by thx-1138 (64.13.xx.xx) on Tue 19 Aug 2008 at 16:18
[ Send Message ]
Dido that!

My backup program, which I thought was the Linux users' program to have, isn't listed!

I rsync in a very simple function, almost an alias.

All I plug in my usb drive and type "backup" . It updates my entire system flawlessly within a few minutes. It seems much better at handling various files and links than a compression program might be.

P.S. Hello users! Like the site. Hope to be around some.

[ Parent ]

Posted by jimmywu (128.132.xx.xx) on Mon 11 Aug 2008 at 13:03
[ Send Message ]
I voted rsnapshot but I actually use rsync. I've actually never heard of rsnapshot until now, but I use rsync with hard links and the --link-dest option to get the effect of incremental backups.

[ Parent ]

Posted by ajt (204.193.xx.xx) on Mon 11 Aug 2008 at 14:02
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

I'd recommend having a look at rsnapshot, it's basically rsync plus just enough to make it smart but not enough extra code to make it BackupPC or some other fuller application.

There is even a good article here to get you going: Simple rotated backups with rsnapshot.

--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam

[ Parent ]

Posted by jimmywu (74.71.xx.xx) on Wed 13 Aug 2008 at 23:51
[ Send Message ]
Thanks for the link - I've bookmarked that for future reference. So far my little homemade rsync seems to work fine because my setup is relatively simple - just rsync /home and /etc to an external USB HD. But if I ever need anything more I'll look into that.

Jimmy
Registered Linux User #454138

[ Parent ]

Posted by randallb (74.94.xx.xx) on Thu 14 Aug 2008 at 18:03
[ Send Message ]
For many things, I use rsync-incr, which is basically a wrapper script that does some fancy hard-linking for incremental backups. I use it with the snapshot mode.

http://colas.nahaboo.net/software/rsync-incr/

Unlike rsnapshot, which requires setting up a config file, rsync-incr is almost a drop-in replacement for rsync.

[ Parent ]

Posted by liotier (212.85.xx.xx) on Mon 11 Aug 2008 at 13:10
[ Send Message ]
I'm looking into Bacula, but for most of my uses I love rdiff-backup !

[ Parent ]

Posted by Utumno (220.133.xx.xx) on Mon 11 Aug 2008 at 16:51
[ Send Message | View Utumno's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

I use a script to periodically rsync everything except for my /home to a spare HDD. Then the script changes /etc/fstab and /boot/grub/menu.lst to reflect the changed partition names. This way I always have a spare system ready to be booted.

[ Parent ]

Posted by adamamyl (80.1.xx.xx) on Mon 11 Aug 2008 at 18:33
[ Send Message ]
i tend to try and use rdiff-backup, but constantly run into issues with it and how it fails to handle differing versions... so when that gets in a pickle, it's a case of resorting to rsync.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (89.137.xx.xx) on Tue 12 Aug 2008 at 11:15
I voted rsnapshot, as I've used it some time ago. I liked that it stored files with original uid & flags, and (mounted read-only) you could give users access to their backup. A total crash would be pretty simple to recover - just copy everything back. I'd still consider it on multi-user system.

I'm an rdiff-backup convert now (via backupninja). I don't like the fact that it can be incompatible between versions and restore is a little more painful, as you're required to use rdiff-backup.

I would not consider paying for a backup (except for offsite maybe) solution.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (90.58.xx.xx) on Tue 12 Aug 2008 at 15:31
backup-manager of course !

It's a very useful and easy-to-configure script.

[ Parent ]

Posted by daemon (146.231.xx.xx) on Tue 12 Aug 2008 at 21:45
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

While I use a bit of tar/bzip2/gzip and rsync here and there, the majority of our backups are done with Bacula (and, I hate to say it, ntbackup where necessary, even if just for the bloody "systemstate" runs).

Although Bacula can seem to have a steep start to the learning curve, it's not really that bad to get started with, although I will be the first to admit that there's so much that you can learn about Bacula, I doubt I'll ever be arrogant enough to claim I'm an expert in it.

One thing I will say though, it's probably not worth trying unless you're responsible for more than 5 odd systems. Or you just think it looks pretty cool, which is how I started off with it ;-)

Cheers.
:wq

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (134.115.xx.xx) on Wed 13 Aug 2008 at 02:49
1. down server ( 1hr downtime is OK )
2. partimage whole disk
3. burn to DVD and take offsite

4. look at backupPC, which hadn't heard of until this poll (c:

[ Parent ]

Posted by ajt (204.193.xx.xx) on Wed 13 Aug 2008 at 13:20
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

I use to do nothing which I thought was okay as I didn't have much data to worry about. I then started to use a home made script and burning tar.bz2 files to CD/DVD. Tarballs are slow and awkward, so I started to use rsync to create backup copies on external disks which was faster and easier for near line recovery.

I've since upgraded my systems and found rsnapshot to local file system and external drives to be easy and while not perfect it's good enough for me. So I voted "rsnapshot".

At work we use some expensive HP DataProtector (aka OmniBack) solution which is quite horrible.

--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam

[ Parent ]

Posted by e5z8652 (206.174.xx.xx) on Thu 14 Aug 2008 at 00:35
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
star, to grab the ACL data (Windows users create files/directories and set ACLs via Samba) and then rsync to shlep it. A bash script inventories the backups available and lets me select files or directories to restore by date available.

[ Parent ]

Posted by sneex (63.139.xx.xx) on Thu 14 Aug 2008 at 14:38
[ Send Message | View sneex's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

[ Parent ]

Posted by ajt (195.112.xx.xx) on Thu 14 Aug 2008 at 19:11
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

I forgot to include that in the poll. It looks very useful but do people use it for routine backup or just disaster recovery?

--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam

[ Parent ]

Posted by sneex (63.139.xx.xx) on Mon 25 Aug 2008 at 15:58
[ Send Message | View sneex's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]
:P I might be the only one using it ... maybe I should switch ...

http://youve-reached-the.endoftheinternet.org/

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (82.44.xx.xx) on Thu 14 Aug 2008 at 22:30
I use git but said "home made script" because it wasn't listed

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (74.245.xx.xx) on Sat 16 Aug 2008 at 16:23
Rsync - of course - why would anyone use anything else? Actually rsync + ssh

[ Parent ]

Posted by endecotp (86.7.xx.xx) on Sat 16 Aug 2008 at 22:48
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
I'd be interested to hear where people backup _to_: tape, CD/DVD, external disk, another local server, over the net etc. I'm sending my most vital files to rsync.net, and more voluminous stuff (e.g. /photos) to CDs and DVDs.

[ Parent ]

Posted by ajt (195.112.xx.xx) on Sun 17 Aug 2008 at 17:26
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

That's a good follow on question.

How do you find rsync.net? I've considered using their services many times, it seems like a good idea.

--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam

[ Parent ]

Posted by endecotp (86.7.xx.xx) on Sun 17 Aug 2008 at 18:01
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
> How do you find rsync.net?

They've not lost any of my data. They're cheap for the smallish amounts of data that I store there. There have been a few short periods of downtime or apparent "disk full" conditions, but not enough to worry about. They reply fairly promptly to emailed questions, but the answer has normally been "no, we can't do that"; for example I asked about using rsync 3.x's use of extended attributes to record uid and gid, but they won't support it (yet).

Overall, I would recommend them if your requirements are like mine. If you want to store larger amounts of data you might prefer to look elsewhere. I would also probably not recommend them to Windows users (i.e. "friends & family"), as their instructions for doing cron'd rsync over ssh on Windows would be miles over the heads of those users.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (147.102.xx.xx) on Mon 18 Aug 2008 at 16:13
I keep my important data (code, web pages, documents, configuration files) in Mercurial (SVN in the past) and always have two repositories (or SVN working copies) in different machines. Easy backup strategy but also a way to organize myself.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (209.48.xx.xx) on Tue 19 Aug 2008 at 00:04
yet another vote for rsync which wasn't really a choice in the orig. poll.... kthxbai

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (65.190.xx.xx) on Tue 19 Aug 2008 at 17:04
I use duplicity. One of the really cool features is that it supports multiple backends like local file system, scp, or even S3.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (216.242.xx.xx) on Thu 21 Aug 2008 at 17:18
We use Symantec Net Backup for our backup needs.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Carlwill (216.242.xx.xx) on Thu 21 Aug 2008 at 19:46
[ Send Message ]
I use Rsync and Cron to backup using *bzip2. Works great and very affordable ;)

[ Parent ]

Posted by eric (82.64.xx.xx) on Fri 22 Aug 2008 at 11:02
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (141.76.xx.xx) on Fri 22 Aug 2008 at 14:42
I use xfsdump.

[ Parent ]

Posted by madphilosopher (207.210.xx.xx) on Mon 25 Aug 2008 at 19:45
[ Send Message ]

Right now:

  • tar + gzip for /var
  • rsync for /home and /mp3
  • rdiff-backup for /etc

--
Darren Paul Griffith
www.madphilosopher.ca

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (212.34.xx.xx) on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 09:29
I sometimes rsync my notebook's home partition over to my server, but there's hardly anything of importance on that.
The server itself holds my important stuff and has a 1.5TB RAID5, so I don't really make backups of that... :)

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (77.233.xx.xx) on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 17:48
I use rdiff-backup, and sometimes together with a lvm snapshot, when files are constantly written.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (68.47.xx.xx) on Mon 1 Sep 2008 at 21:35
I learned how to run AMANDA a while back and have used it ever since. I also use it at home now. The best part about AMANDA is that it optimizes everything. You can set up incrementals everyday if you want. It is fundamental for me now.

[ Parent ]

Posted by fugit (68.198.xx.xx) on Tue 2 Sep 2008 at 01:31
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
I voted for really expensive, but that is at work (legato). This has been pretty bullet proof. Servers on isolated dmzs I use a perl backup script. At home its rsync of the home directory.

[ Parent ]

User Login

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account

Quick Site Search

Poll Archive

View Prior Polls