New User? Register here - Existing Users: Username: Password: [Advanced Login]

 

 

Current Poll

What language for system administration do you use ?







( 731 votes ~ 3 comments )

 

Will you use Debian GNU/kfreebsd "Squeeze" for its ability to have zfs without fuse?

Submitted by jamesm on Sat 1 Jan 2011

Tags: , , ,

 

Yeah, it's a great idea to do so, can't wait to use zfs.  <-> 34%291 votes
Yeah, but don't care about zfs.  <-> 10%90 votes
Nah, but I will use Squeeze on the server I don't think zfs is ready yet for servers.  <-> 5%44 votes
Nah, it's fine as Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze.  <-> 31%267 votes
Nah, I'm staying with lenny.  <-> 8%74 votes
Nah, man its just, well its not Linux no more.  <-> 9%83 votes
Total 849 votes

Posted by milon (115.248.xx.xx) on Tue 4 Jan 2011 at 07:48
[ Send Message ]
yes bcz Debin is the prfct server any ather server(windows2000,2003,2008) so i allowase use this server bcz it's a part of redhat linux server

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (2001:0xx:0xx:0xxx:0xxx:0xxx:xx) on Thu 13 Jan 2011 at 23:26
Wow!

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (71.249.xx.xx) on Fri 14 Jan 2011 at 20:21
What we want is ZFS on a LINUX kernel!

[ Parent ]

Posted by Yojimbo (202.49.xx.xx) on Mon 17 Jan 2011 at 09:50
[ Send Message ]
I can't see any compelling advantage for me to want to use zfs, with fuse or without. Luckily I guess that means I don't have any demanding filesystems to look after at the moment; it's either plain RAID-1 for simplicity, RAID-6 with LVM for midrange, or proper SAN.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (216.116.xx.xx) on Thu 20 Jan 2011 at 13:38
Been using ZFS on fuse. ZFS is amazing, fuse not so much. It works, but CPU usage is high and I don't see consistent results when rebooting. Kernel level ZFS should help a lot.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (173.54.xx.xx) on Fri 21 Jan 2011 at 06:54
i will do ANYTHING to ditch opensolaris right now. solaris SUCKS!

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (201.81.xx.xx) on Thu 27 Jan 2011 at 10:18
I am looking at ZFS, but I don't think that GNU/KFreebsd is ready for prodution use, what about the ZFS module for Linux Kernel ?!?

[ Parent ]

Posted by ajt (195.112.xx.xx) on Sat 29 Jan 2011 at 18:25
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

If you want ZFS on Linux (legally) you will have to ask Oracle. Sun went out of their way to make ZFS incompatible with the Linux kernel.

Now that Oracle own Sun you can't tell what will happen. On paper Oracle are more Linux leaning than Sun were, so they should allow ZFS into Linux, BUT they now own Solaris and have proved to be less than friendly to the open-source community when there is money to be made. Plus they are working on btrfs which is in Linux and they previously claimed was superior so you could argue that ZFS isn't required...

Who knows! If ZFS is good then Oracle should keep it alive as long as people are willing to pay for Solaris. If Oracle think Linux is the future then their best option is to port it into Linux and let ZFS/btrfs merge/complete...

--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam

[ Parent ]

Posted by fugit (199.2.xx.xx) on Thu 27 Jan 2011 at 19:45
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
There should have been will you install it and play with it, but will stick linux kernel for real work. I think its great to have the option, but I'll stick with linux kernel for now.

[ Parent ]

Posted by Anonymous (115.109.xx.xx) on Sun 30 Jan 2011 at 07:24
Would love to see more programs compiled for bsd variants...and if debian provides support i can't ask for more! Can't wait for the release!

[ Parent ]

 

 

Flattr

Poll Archive

View Prior Polls