Weblogs for Utumno
Well, now that Google Chrome is available on Debian:
deb http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/ stable non-free main
is mighty fast and already has a FlashBlock plugin:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/46673
and something that claims to work like AdBlock+ :
http://www.adsweep.org/
I am jumping ship...
The reason? I cannot believe Firefox, or any other browser for that matter, would use a single process for everything, including external plugins like flash or, God forbid, Java. That means if one of your 10 open tabs is launching a Java applet, which tries to connect to some URL, which is temporarily unavailable - the whole browser will hang for minutes!
In Chrome, that never happens.
Dear lazyweb,
I've got a server ( actually CentOS 5 w/ SSH 4.3 ).
The problem with it is that whenever I try to log in ( using a password ) the login is very slow, takes about 10 seconds.
More precisely,
utumno:/home/leszek# ssh -vvv 192.168.65.14 OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-7, OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 debug1: Reading configuration data /home/root/.ssh/config debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to 192.168.65.14 [192.168.65.14] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: permanently_set_uid: 0/0 debug1: identity file /home/root/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file /home/root/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/root/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.3 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.3 pat OpenSSH_4* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-7 debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib@openssh.com,zlib debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib@openssh.com,zlib debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib@openssh.com debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib@openssh.com debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0 debug2: mac_setup: found hmac-md5 debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug2: mac_setup: found hmac-md5 debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug2: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 134/256 debug2: bits set: 530/1024 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: filename /home/root/.ssh/known_hosts debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: match line 24 debug1: Host '192.168.65.14' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/root/.ssh/known_hosts:24 debug2: bits set: 513/1024 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug2: kex_derive_keys debug2: set_newkeys: mode 1 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug2: set_newkeys: mode 0 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug2: service_accept: ssh-userauth debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug2: key: /home/root/.ssh/identity ((nil)) debug2: key: /home/root/.ssh/id_rsa ((nil)) debug2: key: /home/root/.ssh/id_dsa ((nil)) debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password debug3: start over, passed a different list publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password debug3: preferred publickey,keyboard-interactive,password debug3: authmethod_lookup publickey debug3: remaining preferred: keyboard-interactive,password debug3: authmethod_is_enabled publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/root/.ssh/identity debug3: no such identity: /home/root/.ssh/identity debug1: Trying private key: /home/root/.ssh/id_rsa debug3: no such identity: /home/root/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/root/.ssh/id_dsa debug3: no such identity: /home/root/.ssh/id_dsa debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method debug3: authmethod_lookup password debug3: remaining preferred: ,password debug3: authmethod_is_enabled password debug1: Next authentication method: password root@192.168.65.14's password: debug3: packet_send2: adding 64 (len 56 padlen 8 extra_pad 64) debug2: we sent a password packet, wait for reply <---- HERE IT HANGS FOR ABOUT 10 SECONDS debug1: Authentication succeeded (password). debug1: channel 0: new [client-session] debug3: ssh_session2_open: channel_new: 0 debug2: channel 0: send open debug1: Entering interactive session. debug2: callback start debug2: client_session2_setup: id 0 debug2: channel 0: request pty-req confirm 1 debug3: tty_make_modes: ospeed 38400 debug3: tty_make_modes: ispeed 38400 debug1: Sending environment. debug3: Ignored env ORBIT_SOCKETDIR debug3: Ignored env SSH_AGENT_PID debug3: Ignored env SHELL debug3: Ignored env TERM debug3: Ignored env XDG_SESSION_COOKIE debug3: Ignored env GTK_RC_FILES debug3: Ignored env WINDOWID debug3: Ignored env GTK_MODULES debug3: Ignored env USER debug3: Ignored env LS_COLORS debug3: Ignored env SSH_AUTH_SOCK debug3: Ignored env GNOME_KEYRING_SOCKET debug3: Ignored env USERNAME debug3: Ignored env SESSION_MANAGER debug3: Ignored env _JAVA_OPTIONS debug3: Ignored env MAIL debug3: Ignored env PATH debug3: Ignored env DESKTOP_SESSION debug3: Ignored env GDM_XSERVER_LOCATION debug3: Ignored env PWD debug3: Ignored env GNOME_KEYRING_PID debug1: Sending env LANG = en_US.UTF-8 debug2: channel 0: request env confirm 0 debug3: Ignored env GDM_LANG debug3: Ignored env PS1 debug3: Ignored env GDMSESSION debug3: Ignored env HISTCONTROL debug3: Ignored env SHLVL debug3: Ignored env HOME debug3: Ignored env LS_OPTIONS debug3: Ignored env GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID debug3: Ignored env LOGNAME debug3: Ignored env DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS debug3: Ignored env XDG_DATA_DIRS debug3: Ignored env LESSOPEN debug3: Ignored env WINDOWPATH debug3: Ignored env DISPLAY debug3: Ignored env LESSCLOSE debug3: Ignored env COLORTERM debug3: Ignored env XAUTHORITY debug3: Ignored env _ debug2: channel 0: request shell confirm 1 debug2: fd 3 setting TCP_NODELAY debug2: callback done debug2: channel 0: open confirm rwindow 0 rmax 32768 debug2: channel_input_confirm: type 99 id 0 debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0 debug2: channel 0: rcvd adjust 131072 debug2: channel_input_confirm: type 99 id 0 debug2: shell request accepted on channel 0 Last login: Wed Aug 12 14:23:42 2009 from 192.168.65.20
Has anyone seen something like that?
Dear lazyweb,
I've got a log ( a .txt file) containing a loooong sequence of raw network packets. The log looks like this:
ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 03 91 4b 33 57 08 06 00 01 ..3W.... 08 00 06 04 00 01 00 03 91 4b 33 57 0a 27 f4 07 ........3W.'? 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 27 f4 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 .......'?...... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ............ 00 13 11 e9 c3 e6 00 03 91 4b 33 57 08 00 45 00 ...橨?.3W..E. 00 2c 00 bc 00 00 40 06 8b 50 0a 27 f4 07 cb 61 .,.?.@..'?犿 25 30 1b 69 00 50 00 0f 72 25 00 00 00 00 60 02 %0.i.P..r%....`. 16 d0 04 a9 00 00 02 04 05 b4 .??....? (many more packets here)
I am looking for a tool which would let me import (perfectly the whole file, failing that - one packet at a time ) this data and analyze it. (in similar way Wireshark does it for its captures.)
I've searched the web and came up empty-handed. Any hints?
by Simon Johnson"
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200905/imf-advice
I need your help. Situation: I've got here a little embedded device that is suspected to violate DHCP standards, specifically RFC 2132 section 9.7, and I am supposed to setup a test which will confirm this suspicion.
The section says that DHCPOFFER packages must include an option 'server identifier' which is supposed to be set to the IP of the DHCP server ( sometimes the network is setup in this way that there is a machine which relays all traffic - including DHCP packets - to the clients so they cannot just take a look at source IP of the incoming packets to know where the DHCP server is ). The clients are supposed to use this IP for all subsequent communication with DHCP server.
Now, the embedded device is suspected to ignore the 'server identifier' option and send all subsequent DHCPREQUESTS to the IP from where it got its DHCPOFFER, so if there is a relaying machine in between, the device fails to renew its IP.
I have no access to the original setup where this bug was supposedly detected. All I have here is the device and 1 laptop running, of course, Debian. So I have to
1) produce a DHCPOFFER packet whose source IP would be different than the 'server identifier' option inside it,
2) set the lease time to, lets say, 10 seconds ,
3) sniff the network and see which IP the embedded device uses to renew its lease.
The problem is with 1). There are 3 DHCP servers in Debian: dhcp3-server, dnsmasq and udhcpd. AFAIK, dnsmasq and udhcpd do not even let me configure the 'server identifier' , so looks like my only option is to use 'dhcp3-server'.
So I have set up the server to listen on laptop's eth0 with the following dhcpd.conf: ( eth0's IP is 10.0.0.1 )
(... snip...)
subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 10.0.0.3 10.0.0.254;
option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.60;
option domain-name "utumno.com";
option routers 10.0.0.1;
option broadcast-address 10.0.0.255;
max-lease-time 10;
server-identifier 120.30.0.1;
}
I connected the device and everything works: the device gets it's IP, renews it and so on. However, the problem is that dhcp3-server is too clever and as soon as I set the 'server-identifier' option to 120.30.0.1, it starts sending its DHCPOFFER and DHCPACK packets FROM THIS IP, even though it is listening in eth0 which has 10.0.0.1. So for my testing purposes, this setup is useless.
Now, anobody has an idea how can I either
a) force dhcp3-server to produce the desired DHCPOFFER packages?
b) rewrite the source IP with iptables ( iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source=10.0.0.1 doesn't work! Is it because such packets do not go thru NAT? )
c) some other suggestion?
How can I figure out the list of all packages that have been installed from a given repository without manually going over all 1400 of them?
I've got two machines, 'utumno' and 'angband'. 'Utumno' is directly connected to DSL modem and is visible from The Internets; 'angband' is not visible but it is connected to Utumno via a crossover cable so I can ssh to utumno and from there ssh to angband.
Utumno runs Debian Lenny and OpenSSH 5.1, Angband is an embedded device running DD-WRT and Dropbear 0.51
I've set up authorized keys so I can simply type
utumno@ ssh angband
and that works every single time.
Now, I want to be able to directly connect to Angband from outside, so I thought I'd set up local port forwarding with SSH:
utumno@ ssh -g -L 8022:angband:22 angband
That logs me into angband and seems to forward utumno:8022 to (I hope?) angband:22:
utumno@ netstat -aenp | grep 8022 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8022 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 0 9518994 24063/ssh
I thought now I'd be able to log directly to angband by
ssh -p 8022 utumno
but when I try
utumno@ ssh -vv -p 8022 localhost OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 debug1: Reading configuration data /root/.ssh/config debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 8022. debug1: Connection established. debug1: permanently_set_uid: 0/0 debug1: identity file /root/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file /root/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /root/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
and at the same time in angband's console ( the one that I got logged in when I forwarded the ports with ssh -g -L 8022:angband:22 angband ) the following appears
channel 2: open failed: connect failed:
I've tried to Google for 'channel 2: open failed: connect failed:' and 'ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host', but no joy...
I've recently come to realize that apt-get and aptitude are not exactly compatible with each other. For example, hold done the 'apt-get way' :
echo "package_name hold" | dpkg --set-selections
will be ignored by aptitude.
Thus a question: can apt-get and aptitude be safely used concurrently? (save the 'hold' incompatibility) I.e. can I install a package with apt-get, remove it with aptitude, update with system with apt-get, then upgrade it with aptitude? What about other package managers, like synaptic, adept? Can they be mixed with apt-get?
Over there, I discovered a phenomenon I didn't know exist: a lot of people, upon a successful installation, don't (know they have / bother) to edit their sources.list and go on for YEARS with just the CDROM in there ( and they don't even know they should have that inserted if they want to upgrade anything )
Every day I see a couple of lost souls claiming that 'apt doesn't work', and now my standard reply is 'show your sources.list'.
This is real. Debian Installer really needs to stress the need to edit one's sources.list !!