Weblog entry #13 for Utumno

Request for an article
Posted by Utumno on Tue 19 Sep 2006 at 15:37
Tags: none.
I believe many people would be interested at an article about online anonymity - i.e. ways to protect it while chatting, doing P2P or simply browsing the net.

I heard buzzwords like Tor, I2P or Freenet; I haven't studied them myself, though.

Anyone else willing to learn this subject? Anyone willing to share his experiences? I think even a brief explanation of what is possible to be done with help of a certain program/technology ( along the lines of 'using technology XXXX, it is possible to anymously chat with a peer who is running a standard, non-modified MSN Messanger, for details, refer to www.XXXX.org ) would be of great use.

 

Comments on this Entry

Posted by Steve (62.30.xx.xx) on Tue 19 Sep 2006 at 21:45
[ Send Message | View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

The article on Tor from last year still mostly applies ..

I hope people listen to your request though, things change and more articles are always welcome ..

Steve

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by JacobAppelbaum (38.99.xx.xx) on Wed 20 Sep 2006 at 00:30
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
Give me some scope and I'll write something up...

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by Steve (62.30.xx.xx) on Wed 20 Sep 2006 at 09:20
[ Send Message | View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

You're a star!

I don't really know about scope too much - just so long as you show the basics people can ask if they get lost/stuck, right?

Steve

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by Anonymous (61.229.xx.xx) on Fri 22 Sep 2006 at 19:56
I think it would be best if the article would be task-oriented, rather than feature-oriented. What I mean is there are already vast amounts of information about programs like Tor, or I2P online; however, the problem is that a potential reader ( like me ) always starts with some itch he needs to be scratched, and then he has to read vast amounts of info to even figure out which application/technology is able to scratch his itch and if yes, how.

Why dont we start with a list of common privacy-related itches instead, and proceed to description of potential solutions, like this:

- Mr. A works in an evil company that logs all chatting. Mr. X wants to set up some kind of chatting proxy on his home server, tunnel his chatting soft to his home proxy by, let's say, ssh, and this way hide his chatting activities.

- Mr. B takes part in an anti-scamming initiative www.419eater.com and would like to make it hard for the scammers to trace his IP while he's exchanging emails with them.

- Mr. C would like to blog about his company while making sure it cannot discover his identity later on.

- etc etc ...

The point is, I kinda don't like articles titled 'How to set up and use technology X' . Those articles start up with a solution, while we dont have a problem yet. While reading them, I always find myself thinking, 'well, that's all fine and dandy, but how can I use that to scratch my itch?' Let's start up with a clear definition of the problem and only then propose a solution!

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by JacobAppelbaum (38.99.xx.xx) on Fri 22 Sep 2006 at 20:08
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
Sounds good. Let me know what your problem sets are directly and I will work on solutions for you.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by Utumno (61.229.xx.xx) on Sat 23 Sep 2006 at 18:09
[ Send Message | View Utumno's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]
How about something like this:

Mr. X is behind a potentially hostile NAT; i.e. the owner of the NAT'ing machine is able to log his net browsing / chatting / P2P activities. Please propose a working solution :)

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

User Login

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account

Quick Site Search