New User? Register here - Existing Users: Username: Password: [Advanced Login]

 

 

Current Poll

Your preferred Interactive shell?









( 1358 votes ~ 15 comments )

 

Weblog entry #152 for ajt

Windows...
Posted by ajt on Mon 1 Dec 2008 at 21:55
Tags:

Today I was forced to use a vanilla Windows XP system. It was most painful, it looked like it was designed for four year olds, IE6 is utterly dreadful - what are all the advert about? and where are the tabs? I was setting up a web server only to discover that I need to run it under a user account and seriously arse about with it to allow the web server to read files on a network drive.

If I had been able to do use a Linux box I would not have needed to do all the messing about and it would have taken me half the time and would be easier to maintain going forwards. So much for maximising "share holder value", if you ask me, Microsoft is good at maximising their shareholder value but not the poor companies that buy their tat.

By the way, I'm a person not a PC and I run Linux on my PC not some piece of dog poo.

* And yes I'm in a anti-Microsoft mood. *

 

Comments on this Entry

Posted by mcortese (213.70.xx.xx) on Tue 2 Dec 2008 at 13:48
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

Nonetheless, I'm not so negative about Outlook, at least from a user's perspective. It's configuration is richer, although more chaotic, than e.g. Evolution. Ironically, being powerful but difficult to set up has always been the peculiarity of Linux wrt Windows.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by ajt (204.193.xx.xx) on Tue 2 Dec 2008 at 15:29
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]

Outlook is perhaps the one product I'd single out from Microsoft for a special place in hell. It's strange, non standard, slow, unreliable, primitive and one of the biggest conduits for viruses there is. Email clients that are like it are just as evil...

I've found no perfect email client, just less hateful ones. However if you like Outlook you are welcome to my lifetime supply.

--
"I'm A Person Not A PC."
Adam

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by Anonymous (82.41.xx.xx) on Tue 2 Dec 2008 at 22:22
One thing that Outlook should be penalized for is the lack of a "bounce" function to forward a message to a new address - without changing the headers or doing a "forward" operation.

A basic function, that is ideal for sending SPAM off to be retrained, yet missing unless you install extra software.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

 

 

Flattr