Weblog entry #44 for dkg
Apparently, John Conyers and several co-sponsors have introduced HR 801, which appears intended to overturn this remarkable policy, primarily for the benefit of the companies that publish scientific journals.
This bill is a shame, and i had hoped for better from Rep. Conyers, who otherwise has a remarkably positive record as a legislator advocating for government transparency and the public good. Sadly, his stance on so-called "Intellectual Property" seems characterized by heavy-handed legislation designed to benefit the parties already heavily favored by the current imbalanced copyright situation.
If you live in the US (and especially if you live in Conyers' district in Michigan), please send him e-mail or get in touch by phone and tell him to drop the bill. You might also check the list of cosponsors to see if one of them is more local to you.
If you want to read more, Lawrence Lessig has written about this issue, addressing Congressman Conyers directly in the Huffington Post. Curiously, Rep. Conyers' web site contains no mention of HR 801.
Comments on this Entry
Mr. Conyers :
Please do not push HR 801 any further. In fact, please withdraw your sponsorship.
The public funding of scientific research creates a public good -- which is why we as citizens support it through the legislation that funds this research (and the various federal agencies that grant that funding). If the findings of publicly-funded research becomes "intellectual property" unavailable to the public, then we are publicly filling the pockets of the grantees, with no return to the public good.
Thus, the NIH's policy that publicly-funded research be published freely within 12 months is not only reasonable, but clearly the just choice; the federal government acts -- or should act -- in the interest of the American public; if we enrich only a few by public research, we impoverish the public as a whole.
I am a student at a public university. I do not speak for this university when I say this, but I mention this out of respect for the value of public funding of scientific research. Privatizing the results of my research -- or people like me -- makes private profit out of a public good. I respect your work as a representative, and as an advocate for government transparency; constructing private property out of publicly funded research betrays that admirable record.
Please abandon HR 801.
--Jeremy G. Kahn
San Francisco, California
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
You are lucky, the UK government takes the attitude that publicly funded research belongs exclusively to the UK government and it can squeeze as much money out of it as possible. This has a tendency to kill off research as it disappears into a morass of legal blind alleys...
--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Send Message | View dkg's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]
It would be better if we had bills that directly mandate publication of publicly funded knowledge (and have them cover more than just the NIH), instead of having to fight rearguard actions like this just to keep a reasonable policy of one institution in place.
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
It is indeed insane. When I did my PhD I had to sign all my rights over to the UK government's science funding agency SRC/BBSRC before they would pay me. Later on my University wanted me to sign the same rights away to them - which I refused to do as I'd already handed all my rights over to the government. It turns out the University was the body that the government had appointed to "exploit" my research but the two sides were not really talking.
My PhD thesis on "Sexual Selection in the Brown Plant Hopper, Nilaparvata lugens." is in the public domain but the government could have suppressed any of it if it was commercially valuable and there would have been nothing I could have done about it - and I wouldn't have even been able to submit my thesis...
--
"It's Not Magic, It's Work"
Adam
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Send Message | View dkg's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]