Weblog entry #2 for mindmerge

Linux Corporate Desktops
Posted by mindmerge on Sun 9 Jul 2006 at 04:25
Tags: none.
I have been considering writing up a howto regarding Linux on the Corporate desktop. The task of writing it up seems to me much more difficult than the actual implementation and maintenance of the systems were.

A curiosity I have come across over the last few years with other SysAdmin... they are baffled when I speak of Linux on the corporate desktop. Someone else has to be doing it already!? Why am I running into skilled admin that are afraid to venture forth?

Microsoft really has the minds of IT eh!? Would you like a tube of KY with that!?

Personally I can tell you that with knowledge of your distros toolset, coupled with limiting of options to the users your life can be made much easier and freer (as in time).

A key to sanity is to give your users a limited amount of choices, GNU/Linux can be rather daunting when facing the amount of packages on some default installs. Customize the menu and provide clear and known terms for things and your support issues are a breeze... when and if they come up...

I will get around to fully documenting my past Linux corporate desktop builds... at some point... ;-)

 

Comments on this Entry

Posted by rbochan (69.207.xx.xx) on Sun 9 Jul 2006 at 13:49
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
I've had similar issues with regards to the home user environment when I install Debian for a client. These days, I just carry around a package list and a few config files that I dump into their /etc/skel that allows me to
dpkg --set-selections < packages.list
on the machine, then run
dselect install
A few minutes later their machine is installed and they have a nice KDE based setup. Other than adding a few packages by hand if the machine's a laptop, there's not a lot to it that's not part of the normal installation process.

...Rob

The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by mindmerge (66.218.xx.xx) on Sun 9 Jul 2006 at 16:21
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
I like the sig...

Nice I prefer KDE as well... and fluxbox ... ok so ... little bits of all!? ;-) So are you carrying around a usb drive for the installations or using cds for disconnected folks?

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by rbochan (69.207.xx.xx) on Sun 9 Jul 2006 at 20:30
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
I burn a CD at the beginning of each month (damn you mozilla for releasing new FF and T-bird 3 hours later last month!), because I deal with a bit of older equipment, P-II's and such that don't necessarily have decent USB. Other times I'll bring a machine back to the office and take care of things over the high-speed line. It all depends on the situation. I did about 20 Debian installs last year, and have almost doubled that already this year. Lots of folks have older, but working hardware, and software that's woefully out of date and unsecured. A well tailored Debian install makes the machines like new again, and with supported software.

...Rob

The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by Steve (62.30.xx.xx) on Sun 9 Jul 2006 at 15:31
[ Send Message | View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]

More than once I've been a sysadmin in a "small" company, and had the freedom to install my own choice of desktop operating sytem.

Then the company would get bought out/taken over, and we'd suddenly have to change our systems to match the new owners - and that usually mandated Windows 2000 / XP, with a closed mail system such as Lotus Notes, or Microsoft Exchange.

At that point I can't keep my Debian desktop, and usually move on shortly afterwards.

So .. yeah .. sometimes I've had a Debian desktop, but I seem to have been unlucky and unable to keep it for more than a year or two.

Steve

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by mindmerge (66.218.xx.xx) on Sun 9 Jul 2006 at 16:34
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
Ack! Steve! Do it anyway!

I know you have to adhere to corporate policy... blah blah blah... sell the productivity. I am (anyone else?) much more productive using my chosen desktop environment. I have an ergonomic keyboard, mouse, chair and 2 LCD flat panels (different sessions) for my corporate "desktop". I add to that ergonomic cocktail my desktop environment I am most comfortable and productive with....

Make it about productivity... management loves that, and it's true!

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by Anonymous (66.236.xx.xx) on Mon 10 Jul 2006 at 19:08
Several of us where I work want to roll out some linux desktops, and we keep looking for areas where we can "sneak it in", so to speak. The problem is, IT doesn't run the show; sure I can give them OpenOffice, firefox, and some kind of email client, but there is always some kind of niche or custom-built software that requires win32 and it's just the showstopper.

We are a Novell shop, though, so maybe at least a Suse rollout is plausible. Ugh, suse...

At least nobody cares if I use a Linux desktop. I think I'd go crazy if I had to stare at explorer.exe all day.

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

Posted by mindmerge (66.218.xx.xx) on Fri 14 Jul 2006 at 03:57
[ Send Message | View Weblogs ]
Perhaps a solution here is to start poking and prodding the developers. We all know them... Are they still developing only on/for windows?

There are some rather nice open source packages out there that could benefit from some corporate application layout and usability advice...

Just a couple thoughts... ;-)

[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]

User Login

Username:

Password:

[ Advanced Login ]

Register Account

Quick Site Search