Weblog entry #8 for philcore
See all weblog entries made by philcore.
#8
ipv6 mo' better
Posted by philcore on Wed 20 Jul 2011 at 03:02
sweet. v6 access time is better than v4.
[pdyer@lightfoot ~]% ping www.debian-administration.org
PING www.debian-administration.org (89.16.161.98): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 89.16.161.98: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=140.329 ms
64 bytes from 89.16.161.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=141.378 ms
64 bytes from 89.16.161.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=138.095 ms
^C
--- www.debian-administration.org ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 138.095/139.934/141.378/1.369 ms
[pdyer@lightfoot ~]% ping6 www.debian-administration.org
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:470:e49b:2::1fff --> 2001:41c8:10:62::1
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=54 time=99.905 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=1 hlim=54 time=98.745 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=2 hlim=54 time=98.458 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=3 hlim=54 time=96.574 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=4 hlim=54 time=98.868 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=5 hlim=54 time=98.655 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=6 hlim=54 time=98.942 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=7 hlim=54 time=97.709 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=8 hlim=54 time=97.295 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=9 hlim=54 time=97.758 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=10 hlim=54 time=100.314 ms
^C
--- www.debian-administration.org ping6 statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 96.574/98.475/100.314/1.045 ms
[pdyer@lightfoot ~]%
[pdyer@lightfoot ~]% ping www.debian-administration.org
PING www.debian-administration.org (89.16.161.98): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 89.16.161.98: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=140.329 ms
64 bytes from 89.16.161.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=141.378 ms
64 bytes from 89.16.161.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=138.095 ms
^C
--- www.debian-administration.org ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 138.095/139.934/141.378/1.369 ms
[pdyer@lightfoot ~]% ping6 www.debian-administration.org
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:470:e49b:2::1fff --> 2001:41c8:10:62::1
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=54 time=99.905 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=1 hlim=54 time=98.745 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=2 hlim=54 time=98.458 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=3 hlim=54 time=96.574 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=4 hlim=54 time=98.868 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=5 hlim=54 time=98.655 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=6 hlim=54 time=98.942 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=7 hlim=54 time=97.709 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=8 hlim=54 time=97.295 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=9 hlim=54 time=97.758 ms
16 bytes from 2001:41c8:10:62::1, icmp_seq=10 hlim=54 time=100.314 ms
^C
--- www.debian-administration.org ping6 statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 96.574/98.475/100.314/1.045 ms
[pdyer@lightfoot ~]%
Comments on this Entry
Posted by Steve (90.193.xx.xx) on Wed 20 Jul 2011 at 08:39
[ Send Message | View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]
[ Send Message | View Steve's Scratchpad | View Weblogs ]
That's pretty interesting. I guess it should be faster if you have native IPv6, but slower if you use a tunnel of some kind.
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
Posted by Anonymous (85.218.xx.xx) on Thu 21 Jul 2011 at 16:14
This might be a stupid question, but am I missing something or is the v6 sending a smaller packet? Wouldn't this cause it to be faster?
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]
Posted by Anonymous (74.105.xx.xx) on Wed 3 Aug 2011 at 23:19
impact of packet size (16 vs 64) is insignificant
[ Parent | Reply to this comment ]